Legal Opinion

Shay v. Parkhurst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1951No. 31482PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

— Plaintiff, Edwin Shay, grandfather of Sharon Clark, a minor, brought this action as her guardian ad litem to recover damages sustained by the minor child on account of personal injuries alleged to have resulted from her falling out of the door of defendant’s taxicab and for medical expenses incurred in connection with this accident. The case was tried to a court and jury. The trial resulted in a verdict awarding to the plaintiff recovery against the defendant in the sum of ten thousand dollars.

Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative, for a new trial was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morales v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Nopson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Carr v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Auerbach v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Graeff Ex Rel. Graeff v. Baptist Temple of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Nopson v. WocknerWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Emerick v. MayrWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Adamson v. TraylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Beedle v. General Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API