Dool v. First Nat'l Bank of Calexico
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The judgment is reversed. The record is voluminous and several questions are treated at length, but we feel that the discussion material to the conclusion reached by us may be confined within a comparatively small area.
The major portion of the briefs is directed to the question of whether the evidence is sufficient to show that Edward Dool, deceased, on March 27, 1925, at the time of the execution of four promissory notes and a trust deed on several pieces of property to secure them, was a person entirely without understanding, within the meaning of section 38 of the Civil Code, as found by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Staniford v. TromblyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Merry v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.