Legal Opinion

Euzent v. Barrash

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1942No. [No. 2, January Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This appeal is from an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint. The defendant was given twenty-days to answer, but chose to appeal.

According to the bill of complaint, Minnie Euzent, defendant and appellant, owned a half-acre lot in the village of Poplar Spring in Howard County, improved by a building in which she conducted a general store, which she did, on the 22nd day of April, 1941, agree in writing to sell and convey to the plaintiffs and appellees, George Barrash and Mary E. Barrash, his wife, for §7,200, on -account of which they paid §300 in cash, the sum of §1,400 to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Trimble v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. Gibula v. SauseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Noel v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Tucker v. OsbournCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sommers v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Clark v. KirsnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Shulton, Inc. v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Springer v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API