Legal Opinion

Shulton, Inc. v. Rubin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 4, 1965No. [No. 439, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPIammond, J.

The controlling issue in this suit in equity for rescission of a contract by which Shulton, Inc., a relatively large and rich chemical corporation (the complainant below and appellant here), purchased the controlling capital stock of Chemed, Inc., a smaller chemical corporation (an appellee here), is whether the purchase was induced by material misrepresentations of fact made by Martin Rubin, another appellee, the founder, chairman of the board and principal stockholder of Chemed, and by other agents of that corporation.

Martin Rubin was awarded the degree of doctor of philosophy in organic…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ray v. EuriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Casriel v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Ross v. OrrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Standard American Homes, Inc. v. Pasadena Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Brucker v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Baker, Watts & Company v. Miles & Stockbridge Timothy R. Casgar, Baker, Watts & Company v. Miles & Stockbridge Timothy R. CasgarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Henriquez v. HenriquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API