Legal Opinion

Bell v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 10, 1992No. 10442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The plaintiff, Wayne T. Bell, the Newing-ton zoning enforcement officer, appeals from the judg*42ment of the trial court affirming the decision of the defendant Newington zoning board of appeals reversing his denial of the application of the defendant Elsie Yawin and her son, Robert Yawin, for a building permit to erect a single-family residential dwelling. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly failed to find that § 5.1.1.B of the zoning regulations of the town of Newington provides for an automatic merger of nonconforming lots. We agree with the trial court.

The following facts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Torsiello v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Connecticut Sand & Stone Corporation v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Horn v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Molic v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Goulet v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Woznicki v. Stratford Zba, No. Cv 01 0384411 S (Nov. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  5. Woznicki v. Stratford Zba, No. Cv 01 0385049 S (Nov. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API