Legal Opinion

Horn v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 20, 1989No. 7280PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiff applied to the Norwalk zoning inspector for a certificate of zoning compliance as a prerequisite to obtaining a building permit. The zoning inspector denied the application on the basis of his finding that the lot in question (30A) had merged with an adjacent lot (109). That decision was upheld by the zoning board of appeals but subsequently was reversed by the trial court which found that the record did not support a finding of merger. The defendant board appealed to this court.

The defendant made five claims of error.1 In view of our conclusion that the trial court substituted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Torsiello v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Molic v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Fernandes v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Iannucci v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Marino v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Baron v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API