Legal Opinion

Samuelson v. Freeman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1969No. 38838PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

An intrinsic quality of- imprecision found in the statute of limitations as it affects allegations of medical malpractice has emerged since our opinion in Ruth v. Dight, ante p. 660, 453 P.2d 631 (1969), overruling Lindquist v. Mullen, 45 Wn.2d 675, 277 P.2d 724 (1954). This appeal is not likely to make the statute seem more precise.

Eileen Samuelson was injured in an automobile accident Septemeber 17, 1960, and taken immediately to Ballard Hospital in Seattle. Her family physician, Dr. Charles Day, reached the hospital shortly thereafter and, among other injuries, found a fracture of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API