Legal Opinion

Fries v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1961No. Civ. 6096PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The second amended complaint in this matter alleges a class action, brought on behalf of the two named plaintiffs and all others similarly situated, who were cotton growers, against the defendant, which operated cotton gins, to declare it a constructive trustee of 40,000 tons of cottonseed obtained through ginning the plaintiffs’ seed cotton as their agent for which the defendant had not accounted. Seed cotton, which is cotton picked from the cotton plant, consists of cottonseed with the cotton lint attached thereto and incidental debris, such as other parts of the cotton plant, grass, weeds…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Owens v. PyeattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. Cappuccio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Estate of CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. McGaughey v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API