Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Cook
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1977No. 2931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant, according to the briefs, are non-Indians engaged in business activity on Pueblo land. Plaintiff seeks damages from defendant for interference with plaintiff’s business activity. The issues in this interlocutory appeal are: (1) subject matter jurisdiction, and (2) whether the United States is an indispensable party.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff has a permit to remove sand and gravel from specified acreage belonging to the Pueblo of San Ildefonso. This is Indian land. Sangre de Cristo Dev. Corp., Inc. v. City of Santa Fe, 84 N.M. 343, 503…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- South v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. StephensNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kuykendall v. Tim's Buick, Pontiac, GMC, & Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Beth Eva Smith v. Stephen E LandrumMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020