Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Tim's Buick, Pontiac, GMC, & Toyota, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a forcible entry and detainer judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Marlin D. Kuykendall. Defendants claim that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the subject property is located on an Indian reservation, that the plaintiff failed to join the United States as an indispensable party and that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff relief on the merits. We affirm.

In 1969 plaintiff entered into a 25-year commercial lease with the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe. In 1979 plaintiff subleased the land to two individuals,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Langford v. MonteithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Smith Plumbing Company, Inc., Doing Business as White Mountain Supply Company, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Tom's Amusement Co., Inc. v. CuthbertsonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1993
  3. Burnside v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.Navajo Nation Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API