Legal Opinion
South v. Lujan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 2014No. Docket 32,015PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff-Appellant Tiffany South — a former officer with the Sandia Pueblo Police Department (Plaintiff) filed a complaint for violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA), retaliatory discharge, and tortious inference with contract against Defendants-Appellees Isaac Lujan, William Duran, and Mary-Alice Brogdon (collectively, Defendants) in their individual capacities. The district court granted Appellees’ motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction. Because the record on appeal is insufficient to permit review, we reverse and remand for factual…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Britton v. Office of the Attorney Gen. of N.M.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Britton v. Office of the Att'y Gen.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Sipp v. Buffalo Thunder, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems v. ClarkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Mendoza v. Isleta Resort & CasinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.