Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Travelers Insurance Company
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 2001No. A088300PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
I
Introduction
Thomas and Stacy McCormick (the McCormicks) appeal from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers). Travelers insured the McCormicks against flood loss under a standard flood insurance policy issued as part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), a federally subsidized program which provides flood insurance at reasonable rates. The McCormicks sued Travelers for wrongfully denying them insurance coverage under the policy, alleging causes of action for breach of the insurance contract, bad faith and fraud. In…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gowland v. AetnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Re Van Holt, Jo Van Holt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Irene Flick v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sanford J. Berger v. Samuel R. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
- Eaker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Seibels Bruce Ins. Companies v. Deville Condo. Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.