Jaggers v. Hobbs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM-
This is an appeal from an' order' refusing to set aside a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Joe Hobbs, hereinafter called plaintiff, in an action against Ike Jag-gers. Plaintiff filed his action to recover $840 as damages to his trailer truck resulting ' from a collision between plaintiff’s truck and an automobile driven by the defendant.
The defendant first filed a motion to quash the issuance of summons, and when this was overruled he filed an answer and cross-petition seeking damages for personal injuries and damage to his automobile for $1,140. This answer and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- McLaughlin v. NettletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hassell v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Mitchell v. LindlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Gregory v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Opinion No. 73-166 (1973) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973