Legal Opinion
Hassell v. Texaco, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 5, 1962No. 39553PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
On April 18, 1960, Texaco Inc., a corporation obtained a default judgment against defendants, C. E. Hassell, S. C. Hassell, and Carrie Hassell. In that judgment the trial court found, inter alia, that Texaco was the owner and operator of a valid and subsisting oil and gas lease covering the NE14 of NEM of Sec. 18, Twp. 21 N., Rge. 13 E., Tulsa County.
On August 16, 1960, the above defendants filed their petition to vacate the judgment rendered in April 18, 1960. In their answer and cross-petition they denied that Texaco had a valid and subsisting oil and gas lease and alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Deruy v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Liles v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Churchill v. MueggeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Strickland v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. H. Webb Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. HeathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.