Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Lindly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1960No. 38643, 38651PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

The controversies involved in the above styled and numbered appeals are sequels to Ward v. Lindly, Old., 294 P.2d 296, in which this court affirmed a district court judgment, in favor of R. J. Lindly, can-celling a deed purporting to convey from his grandmother and predecessor in title, Nan Bledsoe, to the late W. A. Graham, a certain Pryor Creek, Oklahoma, lot, on which Graham had constructed a duplex apartment building. In that action instituted by Lindly, as plaintiff, against the defendants, Earl Ward, C. D. Mitchell and Baylis L. Graham, as co-administrators of the W.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Doll v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Succession of WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  4. Kingsbury v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mitchell v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Watts v. PinckneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Laub v. SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thompson v. InmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API