Legal Opinion

Hudesman v. Foley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1968No. 39082PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellant David Hudesman initiated this action seeking specific performance of an earnest-money agreement whereby Peter J. Foley and his wife agreed to sell certain real property to appellant’s assignor, Kreger Bros., Inc. Appellant alleged that the Foleys, in contravention of appellant’s outstanding rights under the earnest-money agreement, had sold the property to a third party, respondents George E. Smith and his wife, who had, in turn, recorded a statutory warranty deed. The Smiths were joined as party-defendants in the action, it being contended that they were not bona fide purchasers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. American Universal Insurance v. RansonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Felsman v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. VersusLaw, Inc. v. Stoel Rives, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API