Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Hooper

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2008No. S-12356PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

When Sabra and Taggart Hooper divorced, the superior court awarded nearly sixty-seven percent of the main marital estate to Sabra, and thus gave her about $110,000 more than it gave Taggart. Taggart challenges this division and other rulings. We affirm the property division because we conclude that it was supported by sufficient findings of fact and that the court did not abuse its discretion. But because some other awards require additional explanation, we vacate those awards and remand.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Sabra and Taggart Hooper married in 1991,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cartee v. CarteeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API