Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Wick Construction Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1984No. 6012/6759, 6059/6758PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

These consolidated appeals arise out of a contract awarded to Wick Construction Company for the construction of the Juneau courthouse and office building. Appellants Kenai Glass Company and Industrial Indemnity Company raise numerous issues on appeal.

In February 1973, the Alaska State Housing Authority (ASHA) awarded the contract to construct the Juneau court and office building to Wick Construction Company. Wick subcontracted all work relating to the fabrication and erection of the curtainwall, an aluminum and glass structure enclosing the building, to Kenai Glass…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Jesko v. Stauffer Chemical CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Montgomery Ward v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. University of Alaska v. Simpson Building Supply CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fairbanks Builders, Inc. v. Morton DeLima, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Harrelson v. HarrelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Barnett v. BarnettAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. A.F. Lusi Construction, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API