Mills Novelty Co. v. Farrell
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
By stipulation this case is at final issue upon the bill of complaint, answer, affidavits, exhibits, and oral testimony. The question presented is whether plaintiff’s rights have been violated in view of the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The evidence shows that the Mills Novelty Company, an Illinois corporation, doing a business estimated at $6,000,000 annually, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of candy mints as well as a certain type of automatic vending machine described as the “Mills Non-convertible Tender.” It…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Boynton v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Ashcraft v. HealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- White v. HesseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Walker v. BegoleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Mills Novelty Co. v. BolanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951
- Walker v. BegoleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936