Ashcraft v. Healey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a hill seeking an injunction to prevent the superintendent of police o-f New Orleans from repeatedly arresting plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, for alleged violations of a state statute which prohibits the use of slot machines as gambling devices. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the District Court.
The hill substantially alleges as follows: Plaintiff owns a number of automatic mint-vending machines, which are placed in various commercial establishments on a profit-sharing basis. Assuming that the said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Tonahill v. MolonySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Davies v. Mills Novelty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Mills Novelty Co. v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Essman v. HoodDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1930
- Mills Novelty Co. v. FarrellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.