Legal Opinion

Walker v. Begole

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 14, 1936No. 13,677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFFS in error are hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendants in error as the city.

Plaintiffs brought injunction to restrain the city from interfering with their business, from destroying or seizing their property, or threatening to do so. The temporary writ was denied and demurrers to the complaint and an amended complaint, for want of facts, sustained. Plaintiffs stood, and to review a judgment of dismissal they prosecute this writ. The five assignments amount to nothing more than an allegation of error in sustaining the demurrer.

The amended complaint recites, in substance:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of Denver v. BeedeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. City of Canon City v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Armstrong v. Johnson Storage & Moving Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Approximately Fifty-Nine Gambling Devices v. People Ex Rel. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Farmers' Dairy League, Inc. v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. MacArthur v. WyscaverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Bunzel v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API