Legal Opinion
Mills Novelty Co. v. Bolan
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1933No. 6930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
Mills Novelty Company, the complainant herein, seeks to enjoin the commissioner of police of the police department of the city of New York, and the deputy chief inspector of the police department of the city of New York, from unlawful interference with mint venders, known as “Mills Non-Convertible Venders,” owned and leased by the complainant within the city of New York and within the jurisdiction of this court.
Judge Thomas, in the ease of Mills Novelty Company v. Farrell, 3 F. Supp. 555, in the United States District Court, District of Connecticut, made a final…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Mills Novelty Co. v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951