Legal Opinion

State v. Ditzel

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1957No. 2727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*237OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HarnsbergerJustice Harnsberger

Criminal complaint was filed against Charles Dit-zel, charging that defendant “acting in a fiduciary capacity, did, without good cause, fail and refuse, when legally required by proper persons, to account for and pay over to such persons as were lawfully entitled to receive the same, property which came into his hands by virtue of his fiduciary capacity * * *” .

This wording of the charge conforms to the language used in § 9-328 Wyoming Complied Statutes 1945, which calls such conduct “embezzlement”. The information to which Dftzel entered his plea of not guilty upon which he was tried…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Ben H. Frank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Haigler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Buchanan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Padilla v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Taylor v. MacDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sidwell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API