Sidwell v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Appellant’s orchestrated efforts to lure two teenaged friends of his son far from home for a sexual encounter struck a sour note when the boys realized their predicament and fled into the custody of authorities. Convicted on two counts of taking indecent liberties with minors, appellant appeals alleging several procedural irregularities. Finding none, we affirm.
I. ISSUES
Appellant, Douglas Sidwell (Sidwell), presents three issues on appeal:
1. Did the trial court deprive the appellant of his right to confront the witnesses against him when it refused his request for another…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santiago Tapia v. Robert TansyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Nimmo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Stout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. SikorskiWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000