Haigler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Burt E. Haigler, appeals from a conviction and sentence for wilfully, knowingly and unlawfully attempting to defeat and evade his income tax liability for the calendar year 1941, by filing or causing to be filed a false and fraudulent return in violation of Section 145(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(b). The principal, and we think decisive, question here is whether the trial court erroneously excluded proffered testimony tending to negative any wilful intent to defeat and evade his income tax liability.
Wilfulness being an essential…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- One 1941 Buick Sedan, Motor Number 64286106 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Dearing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by32 opinions
- Marvin L. Cooley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Archie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Wardlaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Richard A. AitkenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.