Legal Opinion

Haigler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1949No. 3735PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Burt E. Haigler, appeals from a conviction and sentence for wilfully, knowingly and unlawfully attempting to defeat and evade his income tax liability for the calendar year 1941, by filing or causing to be filed a false and fraudulent return in violation of Section 145(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(b). The principal, and we think decisive, question here is whether the trial court erroneously excluded proffered testimony tending to negative any wilful intent to defeat and evade his income tax liability.

Wilfulness being an essential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. One 1941 Buick Sedan, Motor Number 64286106 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Dearing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Marvin L. Cooley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Archie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Wardlaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. United States v. Richard A. AitkenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API