Powers v. Chabot
California Supreme Court
Appeals from two judgments of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County denying a motion for judgment against sureties on an undertaking on appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
These two appeals have been considered together. The last-named is a proceeding in a case brought to restrain defendant Powers from transferring a certain promissory note. Powers answered, and, by a cross-complaint, sought to foreclose a chattel mortgage. A decree of foreclosure was entered, and plaintiffs appealed, giving two bonds, one for three hundred dollars, and a stay bond in double the amount of the judgment, with Pardee and Chabot as sureties.
The judgment having been affirmed, upon return of the remittitur, a sale was had of the mortgaged property, from which only a part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Gardner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Powers v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by17 opinions
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Barnes v. Buffalo Pitts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.