Frick v. Hoag
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
This is an action at law brought to collect the unpaid principal of a promissory note together with interest and attorney fees. Defendant appeals from the denial of his equitable defense of reformation and the resulting judgment for the plaintiffs on the note.
The dispute arose because one of the terms of the promissory note conflicted with a term in a contract previously entered into by the parties.
Plaintiffs were owners of subdivided property which defendant, a developer, wished to buy. In January of 1974, the parties entered into an "Exchange Agreement.” By the terms of this contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manning Lumber Co. v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Mayer v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Moyer v. RamseyerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Mitchell v. CherneckiOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Ellison v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Groff v. KohlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Main v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.