Moyer v. Ramseyer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
The plaintiffs Moyer appeal from a decree which reformed a contract as prayed in an equitable answer to Moyers’ action at law for damages arising out of the defendants Ramseyers’ inability to convey certain interests in lands described in a written contract.
The parties will be referred to by their last names. Both parties include husband and wife. Moyer is in the pole and piling business. Mr. Moyer was his own principal witness. Ramseyer is a partial invalid. He was present, but did not testify at the trial. Apparently much of the Ramseyers’ part of the transaction was managed by Mrs.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Manning Lumber Co. v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- General Electric Supply Corp. v. Republic Construction Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Hyde v. KirkpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Frick v. HoagOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Koennecke v. Waxwing Cedar Products, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.