Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Hehemann

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 10, 1914PublishedCited by 26 opinions

lAJppeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas No. 1).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn

— Affirming.

In 1909 and 1910, Cabel street was used as a city dump. Appellees recovered a judgment for $500 against the City of Louisville for the injury this dump caused to their property and damage in their use of it. They owned and lived in a little two-room house on Pocahontas alley in the “Point.” The property reached back 150 feet to Cabel street. In 1909, when the city began to create the nuisance complained of, these two rooms sheltered the appellees and their eight children. The territory of the Point is low and fiat and subject to periodical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Sharp v. BowlarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. City of Georgetown v. AmmermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Ashbury v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  4. Miller v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API