Legal Opinion

Burns v. Winroc Corp.(Midwest)

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2008No. Civil 06-4373 (JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Tyrone Burns and Marvin Dortch are African-Americans employed by defendant The Winroc Corporation (Midwest). Plaintiffs brought this action against defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), alleging a racially hostile work environment and retaliation in response to their discrimination complaints. Plaintiffs also bring a claim for common law negligence. This case is now before the Court on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Springer v. McLANE COMPANY, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  2. Lewis v. City of BurnsvilleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  3. Powell v. StaycoffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API