Legal Opinion
Springer v. McLANE COMPANY, INC.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 11, 2010No. Civ. 09-1439 (RHK/JJG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Naomi Springer has sued her former employer, Defendant McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), alleging pregnancy discrimination and reprisal in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. § 363A.01 et seq. Presently before the Court is McLane’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion.
BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are not in dispute. McLane is a grocery company with a distribution center in Northfield, Minnesota. The center distributes groceries…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEESCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mehl v. Portaco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Isis Gipson v. Boston Scientific Scimed Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Reid v. BCBSM, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015