Fogarty v. Gallegos
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee John D. Fogarty brought this action against six Albuquerque Police Department (“APD”) officers and supervisors (“defendants”),1 alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as state law tort claims. On appeal, defendants assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity from the § 1983 claims and summary judgment on certain of Fogarty’s state law tort claims. Exercising limited jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985), we affirm the district…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by760 opinions
- Dodds v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Estate of Marvin L. Booker v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Bryson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Martinez v. BeggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
755 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.