Samica Enterprises, LLC v. Mail Boxes Etc. USA, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [126, 131]
OTIS D. WRIGHT II, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 9, 2006, over two hundred franchisees, principals and guarantors of “The UPS Store” filed this action against various Mail Boxes Etc., Inc. (“MBE”) and United Parcel Service, Inc. entities (“UPS”). Plaintiffs allege they were duped into investing in The UPS Store franchises, which are (allegedly) economically unviable. On October 29, 2007, the court directed each side to select for trial two “Phase I Plaintiffs” (i.e., those who invested in The UPS Store directly) and two…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marquardt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- California Pines Property Owners Ass'n v. PedottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Toyz, Inc. v. Wireless Toyz, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Cheryl Albaugh v. The ReserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Cheryl Albaugh v. The ReserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.