Legal Opinion

People v. Murakami

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1932No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of grand theft in an information, the charging part of which read as follows: “The District Attorney of the County of Fresno hereby accuses T. S. Murakami of a felony to-wit: Grand theft in that on or about the 15th day of May, 1930, in the County of Fresno, State of California, he unlawfully took the property of the Fresno Mutual Savings Association, a voluntary association, consisting of the sum of $300.25, in lawful .money of the United States.”

This appeal is from a judgment which followed his conviction by a jury, and from an order denying a motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. FewkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. CoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. WoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API