Legal Opinion

People v. Woodson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1936No. Crim. 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand theft. He has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying a new trial.

Appellant seeks a reversal upon the grounds that there was a material variance between pleading and proof; that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a different offense; that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction on the offense charged; that the trial court misdirected the jury and erred in refusing certain instructions offered by appellant.

Appellant did not take the stand at the trial and the evidence is uncontradicted on all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FewkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. LeavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. People v. MeserosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. LaMarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API