People v. Mahlman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement; from the judgment rendered therein, and an order refusing a new trial, he has appealed.
His first contention is, that the information filed against him was defective, and did not state any offense, in that it did not specify the person whose property he had embezzled.
That part of the information material to this discussion is: “The said Henry Mahlman, on or about the thirteenth day of April, A. D. 1886, at the said city and county of San Francisco, was an officer, to wit, the treasurer, of Germania Lodge No. 7, Order of Hermann…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. GogginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. CoblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. OkomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Webb v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.