Hurley v. Wilson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was originally brought by respondent, as plaintiff, to foreclose a deed, absolute in form, as a mortgage. Personal service was had upon each of the defendants. No appearance was made by either of them, and in due course they were adjudged *568in default. Evidence was heard on behalf of plaintiff, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made, and on January 23, 1922, a decree was entered granting the relief prayed for. After notice duly given, the mortgaged property was sold by the sheriff as ordered by the decree, on February 25, 1922, the plaintiff becoming the purchaser for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- McDougall v. WallingWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Livesley v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Bozzio v. VaglioWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Myers v. LandrumWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Leavitt v. De YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Beckett v. CosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Rule v. SomervillWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Robertson v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.