Legal Opinion

McDougall v. Walling

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1899No. 3232PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.— Hon. Fbabtk: T. Reid, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Appellant filed his petition in the superior court of Snohomish county, praying that a judgment recovered by respondent Swalwell against appellant he vacated on the grounds of fraud practiced by the respondent in obtaining the judgment, and because of after-discovered evidence which would have changed the result had it been produced at the trial, but which was suppressed by Swalwell. The cause has been before this court twice, reported in 15 Wash. 78 (45 Pac. 668, 55 Am. St. Rep. 871), and in 19 Wash. 80 (52 Pac. 530). A concise statement is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hass v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Graver v. FaurotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Stewart v. DuncanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Nelson v. MeehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  3. Davis v. SeaveyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Robertson v. FreeburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Price v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API