Legal Opinion

Myers v. Landrum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1892No. 522PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

Appellant Myers, claiming to own the property seized by the sheriff, delivered to him an affidavit and bond under Code Proc., § 461. The sheriff accepted the bond, and delivered the property to Myers. Bigelow and one Knight were the sureties on the bond. Respondent, in response to Myers’ affidavit, filed an answer and counterclaim, and Bigelow a so-called intervention. The answer was uncalled for, as we have decided in Chapin v. Bokee, ante, p. 1. The counterclaim stated no cause of action, as the statute provides for a judgment against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Spokane Falls v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Northern Pacific & Puget Sound Shore Railroad v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Peterson v. CrosierUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bonnifield v. ThorpDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1896
  4. Jordan v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hurley v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API