Beckett v. Cosby
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bradford, J. †
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether this court can say that the trial court manifestly abused its discretion in denying a motion to vacate a default judgment against the corporate and individual defendants.* 1
The issue arises out of the following factual pattern. The individual defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Jack Cosby, were properly served with summons and complaint on February 9, 1966. Proper service was also made upon the corporate defendant, Cosby & Beckett Insurance Agency, Inc., on February 19, 1966. The plaintiff, John J. Beckett, alleged in the complaint that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Yeck v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Osborne v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Roth v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Bergren v. Adams CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Commercial Courier Service, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.