Buell Et Ux. v. Mathes Et Ux.

This cause is before us upon a motion of the respondents for

“an order striking from the record appellants’ brief and affirming the decree of the Circuit Court for Jackson County, heretofore granted herein, on the ground and for the reason that appellants’ said brief does not comply with Rule 2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 9 O. C. L. A., page 317, in that said brief does not present any Assignments of Error for this court to consider. ’ ’

Appellants’ brief does not employ the term “assignment of error.” It sets forth fifteen “propositions of law.” Only one of them mentions a ruling made…