Legal Opinion

McADAM ET UX v. SMITH

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiffs bring this suit to quiet title to certain tidelands along the Columbia river abutting upon upland title to which is vested in the plaintiffs. The defendants appeal from a decree for the plaintiffs.

At one time the upland and tideland were in separate ownership. By patent issued in 1882 Jacob S. Rinearson acquired title to the following land:

“* * * the West half of the South West Quarter. And the Lots numbered two and four of Section Thirty-four in Township Eight North of Range Three West of the Willamette Meridian in Oregon containing One Hundred and Fifty-nine acres and Ninety…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dickinson v. Arkansas City Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Haberman v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of Smith v. SpinelliAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hurd v. ByrnesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Coussens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Howe v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Fossi v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API