Legal Opinion

American National Fire Insurance v. Mirasco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 2001No. 99 Civ. 12405(RWS), 00 Civ.5098(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

American National Fire Insurance Co. and Great American Insurance Co. (the “Insurers”), plaintiffs in 99 Civ. 12405 (the “New York Action”) and defendants in 00 Civ. 5098 (the “Georgia Action”), have moved for summary judgment to dismiss the punitive damage counterclaim of defendant Mirasco, Inc. (“Mirasco”) in the New York Action as well as a similar claim in the Georgia Action. Both the counterclaim and claim are based upon a Georgia statute providing a remedy for bad faith on the part of the insurer. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sichel v. UNUM Provident Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Scherer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Seidel v. Houston Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API