Legal Opinion

Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1994PublishedCited by 502 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

In both of these first-party insurance actions alleging unfair claim settlement practices, the issue presented is whether plaintiffs have pleaded actionable claims for punitive damages. We conclude they have not.

I

Rocanova

In 1985, plaintiff Mark Rocanova purchased an individual disability income policy from defendant Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. Rocanova later increased his coverage effective November 1987. Shortly thereafter he filed a claim for payment under the policy, asserting that a month after the effective date of the increased…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by502 opinions

  1. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Ross v. Louise Wise Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CONew York Court of Appeals · 1995

497 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API