Brinton v. Davidson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from a decree reforming a deed of conveyance of land in the City of Harrisburg by adding a provision that the grantee assumed payment of the principal and interest of two mortgages encumbering the land. These mortgages were created by a prior owner. The hill alleged that the parties to the deed had made the agreement added by the decree, bnt that the provision was omitted by mistake of counsel who supervised the drawing and execution of the deed.
The statement of questions involved for review, to which, under the rule, we limit our consideration, is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brooks v. ConstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- William Sellers & Co. v. Clarke-Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Williams Et Ux. v. MoodhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Herr v. BardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.