Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Conston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1946No. Appeals, 197 and 214 to 222PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,. The question involved is whether the findings of fact of the chancellor, approved by the court in banc, are supported by the evidence.

The suit is in equity, by a fiduciary of an estate of a decedent, and others, to set aside the sale of a chain of millinery stores on the ground of inadequacy of consideration. Allegations are made and denied that a ■confidential relationship existed between the vendor and vendee and of the existence of fraud — actual and constructive. The learned court below found as a fact that no confidential relationship existed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dorrance's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Null's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Biddle v. JohnsonbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API