Williams Et Ux. v. Moodhard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
This litigation — an unfortunate controversy between erstwhile friends of long standing — resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs in the sum of $13,434.80. A new trial must be granted because defendant was prevented from fully presenting his case.
Plaintiffs averred the facts to be as follows: In February, 1936, Cora M. Williams was the owner of a house and tract of land located on the Philadelphia Pike in Berks County. She and her husband, Thomas A. Williams, had given their bond, secured by a mortgage on this real estate, in the amount of $8,000, to Berks County…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Metzger v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McBride v. Western Pennsylvania Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Barry v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Penn Athletic Club Bldg.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Martin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.