Legal Opinion

Williams Et Ux. v. Moodhard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1941No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This litigation — an unfortunate controversy between erstwhile friends of long standing — resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs in the sum of $13,434.80. A new trial must be granted because defendant was prevented from fully presenting his case.

Plaintiffs averred the facts to be as follows: In February, 1936, Cora M. Williams was the owner of a house and tract of land located on the Philadelphia Pike in Berks County. She and her husband, Thomas A. Williams, had given their bond, secured by a mortgage on this real estate, in the amount of $8,000, to Berks County…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Metzger v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. McBride v. Western Pennsylvania Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Barry v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Penn Athletic Club Bldg.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. Martin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API