Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2002No. S091453PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*476Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In California, a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer of a defective product is strictly liable in tort for any resulting harm to a person or to property other than the product itself. This case presents two issues: (1) Can a manufacturer of windows installed in a mass-produced home during its construction ever be strictly liable in tort for harm resulting from defects in those windows? (2) If so, is that manufacturer strictly liable in tort for resulting physical damage to other parts of the house in which the windows have been installed? We answer “yes” to both questions.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  4. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  5. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API