State v. Barnette, 06 Ma 135 (12-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Chad Barnette appeals from his maximum, consecutive sentences totaling eighty-four years entered by the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court upon resentencing after the Supreme Court remanded pursuant to State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856. The first issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly complied with R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. The second issue is whether the sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
{¶ 2} On January 29, 2001, appellant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MatlandOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Mayor, 07 Ma 177 (12-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Goins, 06-Ma-131 (3-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Jones, 07 Ma 159 (6-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.