Legal Opinion

State v. Mathis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2006No. Nos. 2004-1171 and 2004-1267PublishedCited by 683 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} We accepted discretionary appeals and consolidated these two cases that questioned whether the court of appeals may order a limited remand for necessary statutory findings to be placed on the record or whether it must vacate the sentence and remand for a de novo sentencing hearing.

{¶ 2} Appellees Preston Mathis and Dwayne Fair were each convicted of multiple offenses and received maximum and consecutive prison terms. The Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County found that the trial courts failed at the sentencing hearings to make oral findings or state reasons to justify either maximum or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by683 opinions

  1. State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2010

678 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API